SVM regression (SVR) vs Linear Regression

1 min read

One particular nice thing about SVR is that the weight of each feature reflects the feature’s true contribution. If some features are highly correlated (this is common in neuroimaging data – e.g. adjacent voxel activity are very similar), you expect that the corresponding weights to be similar. SVR exactly does that. Linear regression, on the other hand, will give big weight to the feature which is best correlated to the dependent variable (y). Here is a demonstration in MatLab.

In the following simulation, we have 10 features which are highly correlated (see figure below).

Correlation between features
Correlation between features

And the variable to be predicted is fairly nicely correlated with the features. Below I plotted the weight of 10 features. The blue curve is for SVR, and the red is for linear regression. As you can see, the weight for SVR is smooth and balanced, but the weight for regression is like ‘winner takes all’, the 1st feature has a big weight but others very small.

Weight of Features (blue: SVR, red: regression)
Weight of Features (blue: SVR, red: regression)

Here are the source code in MatLab. normalize.m can be found at https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1083

N = 1000;
M = 1;
t = randn(N,1);

clear r
m = 10;%1:10:100;
for M = m
x = [t];
for ii=1:M-1
    x = [x  t+ii*randn(N,1)/10];
end

x = normalize(x);

% t1 = randn(N,1);
% t2 = randn(N,1);
% x = [t1 t2];
% y = 3*t1 - 5*t2;
y = 2*t + randn(N,1)/2 + 0;

% corrcoef([x y]);
%
% b= glmfit(x,y);
for ii = 1
    for jj=1
        tic;model = svmtrain(y(1:N/2),x(1:N/2,:),['-s 4 -t 0 -n ' num2str(ii/2) ' -c ' num2str(1)]);toc
        tic;zz=svmpredict(y(N/2+1:end),x(N/2+1:end,:),model);toc
        tmp = corrcoef(zz, y(N/2+1:end));
        r(M) = tmp(2);
    end
end

w = model.SVs' * model.sv_coef;
b = -model.rho;
b1 = [w]

% regression
b2 = glmfit(x(1:N/2,:), y(1:N/2,:));
yy = x(N/2+1:end,:)*b2(2:end) + b2(1);
b2 = b2(2:end)

sum((zz - y(N/2+1:end)).^2)
sum((yy - y(N/2+1:end)).^2)

end

figure('color','w');imagesc(corrcoef(x));colorbar
caxis([0 1])
figure('color','w');plot(b1,'o-');hold on;plot(b2,'o-r');xlabel('feature index');ylabel('weight')

return

hold on;plot(m, r, 'ro-');xlabel('# of dimension'); ylabel('r')
figure('color','w');plot(m, r, 'ro-');

figure('color','w');plot(x(1:N/2,:), y(1:N/2), 'b.');
hold on;plot(x(N/2+1:end,:), zz, 'r.');
xlabel('x')
ylabel('y')
legend({'training','test'})

%figure('color','w'); plot(zz, y(N/2+1:end), '.'); axis equal;axis square;
%figure('color','w'); plot(zz - y(N/2+1:end), '.')



写作助手,把中式英语变成专业英文


AI writing papers with real references


Want to receive new post notification? 有新文章通知我

第六十八期fNIRS Journal Club视频 夏伟力

Youtube: https://youtu.be/R2rHR5Wq9AU 优酷: https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjUwNjAzNzA4MA==.html 以左侧背外
Wanling Zhu
18 sec read

第六十八期fNIRS Journal Club通知2025/12/6, 10am 夏伟力

以左侧背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)为靶点的间歇性 θ 爆发刺激(iTBS)已成为治疗重度抑郁障碍的成熟方案,但其在刺激过程中及刺激后瞬时对神经兴奋性的影响仍不清楚。来自香港理工大学的夏伟力将分享探讨
Wanling Zhu
13 sec read

第六十七期fNIRS Journal Club视频 肖雅琼教授团队

Youtube: https://youtu.be/c8ei0HMMxHU 优酷: https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNjUwMDQyMjcwNA==.html 近年来,越
Wanling Zhu
17 sec read

2 Replies to “SVM regression (SVR) vs Linear Regression”

  1. Very interesting. I was running into a similar problem with regression and wonder what the underlying reason for the winner takes all phenomenon is. Do you know more about it?
    Thanks,
    Henning

  2. Great article!

    e-SVR seems also to work great on Binary Classification Problems like pedestrian detection (Better than SVC…). I am a bit confused since Regression is for continuous output whereas Classification is discrete-oriented. Could you give me some insights about that (SVR vs SVC) ?

    Cheers,

    Djébril

Leave a Reply to Henning Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *