SVM regression on time series, is there a lag?

1 min read

It would be nice if we can predict the future. For example, give the following time series, can we predict the next point?

Let’s use SVM regression, which is said to be powerful. We use the immediate past data point as the predictor. We train our model with the first 70% of data. Blue and Black are actual data, and Red and Pink are predicted data.

The prediction in general matches the trend. But if you look closely, you see that the predicted data is always lagging the actual data by one time step. See a zoom in below.

Why does this lag come from?

Let’s plot the predictor and the predicted (i.e. the current data point vs the next data point):

It looks normal to me.

It took me a few hours to think about this. Well, the reason turns out to be simple. It’s because our SVM model is too simple (only taking the last data point as predictor): if a data has a increasing trend, then the SVM model, which only consider the immediate history, will give a high predicted value if the current data value is high, a low value if the current data value is low. As a consequence, the predicted value is actually more similar to the current value – and that gives a lag if compared to the actual data.

To reduce the lag, you can build a more powerful SVM model – say use the past 2 data points as the predictor. It will make a more reliable prediction – if the data is not random. See below comparison: you can easily see the lag is much smaller.

Source code can be downloaded here test_svr. Part of the source code is adapted from http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18300270/lag-in-time-series-regression-using-libsvm


Receive email notification via email
Don't want to miss new papers in your field? Check out Stork we developed:

fNIRS Journal Club 视频 浙江大学刘涛研究员

浙江大学刘涛研究员 浙江大学的刘涛研究员,博士生导师, 为大家讲解一篇商科领域的EEG文章: Samuel B. Barnett, and Moran Cerf (2017), “A ticket for your thoughts: Method for predicting content recall and sales using neural...
Xu Cui
10 sec read

fNIRS Journal Club 通知 2020/6/28, 11am

北京时间2020年6月28日周日上午11点,浙江大学的刘涛研究员,博士生导师, 将为大家讲解一篇商科领域的EEG文章。文章中提出的方法对近红外领域有很好的借鉴作用。同时,刘老师会结合他最近的一篇文章,讲一下类似的时间窗口方法可以帮助我们了解什么额外信息。 时间: 北京时间2020年6月28日周日上午11点 地点: https://zoom.com房间号: 876 6491 1732密码: 819151 他要讲的文献如下: Samuel B. Barnett, and Moran Cerf (2017), “A ticket for your thoughts: Method...
Xu Cui
50 sec read

NeuroSync 2020 线上国际研讨会

北京时间2020-06-13,NeuroSync 2020 线上国际研讨会将会通过Zoom和小鹅通召开,具体日程见下。欢迎大家参加。
Xu Cui
0 sec read

8 Replies to “SVM regression on time series, is there a lag?”

  1. Hi Mr Cui,
    I have found the same situation that you described here in this post.
    I tried to add more data points before the day that I want to predict, despite that the lag is still there. How is possible that? I have to change in manual way some weights in the the SMV Function about these previous data in order to obtain a future value?

  2. Hi Xu Cui,

    1)Which part of your source codes correspond to the lag reduction?
    2)What if my data do not have a trend? If it’s random, can the code be used to reduce the lag?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *