Some tips to use wavelet toolbox

55 sec read

Wavelet toolbox is a useful tool to study hyperscanning data. Many recent publications on NIRS hyperscanning use wavelet coherence to quantify the relationship between two interacting brains (e.g. Baker et al 2016, Nozawa et al 2016). You can see more information about wavelet coherence at https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1169

wavelet
wavelet

Here are some tips to use the toolbox:

1. It often takes a long time to run Monte Carlo simulation. You may use ‘mcc’=0 to disable it.

figure;wtc(signal(:,jj),signal(:,jj+22),'mcc',0);

2. If you need to get the values of the result (instead of the graphic), you may specify the return value

[Rsq,period,scale,coi,sig95] = wtc(signal1,signal2,'mcc',0); %Rsq is a complex matrix

3. If you are only interested in a certain band, you can specify the MaxScale (i.e. ms) parameter. More information at https://www.alivelearn.net/?p=1518

[Rsq,period,scale,coi,sig95] = wtc(signal1,signal2,'mcc',0, 'ms', 128);

4. If you are interested in finding the “phase” information (visualized by the arrows), you may use xwt function. The returned value is a complex matrix and you can calculate the phase.

[Rsq,period,scale,coi,sig95] = xwt(signal(:,jj),signal(:,jj+22));
figure;imagesc(angle(Rsq));

5. To visualize the power of a single signal, you may use wt, which I personally feel much better than FFT.

figure;wt(signal(:,jj));

6. To change the density of the arrows, you may specify the ArrowDensity parameter

figure;wtc(signal(:,jj),signal(:,jj+22),'mcc',0,'ArrowDensity',[30 30]);

Do you have any tips? Please let me know.

第十九期 fNIRS Journal Club 通知 2021/05/29,9:30am

美国普渡大学童云杰助理教授,将为大家讲解他们组最近被接受的一篇使用近红外相位信息研究脑血流变化的文章。热烈欢迎大家参与讨论。 时间: 北京时间2021年5月29日上午9:30地点: https://zoom.com房间号: 846 8391 7517密码: 805190 童云杰教授简介:普渡大学 生物医学工程助理教授、博士生导师。主攻方向是多模态脑成像, 包括核磁,fNIRS, EEG。关注脑功能及生理信号的提取与研究。发表论文九十余篇,引用上千次(H-index = 20)。 童教授要讲解的文章如下: Liang Z, Tian H, Yang HC, Arimitsu T, Takahashi...
Xu Cui
12 sec read

第十八期 fNIRS Journal Club 视频

北京时间2021年4月25日10点,北京师范大学的朱朝喆教授为大家讲解了他们最近几年在经颅脑图谱(Transcranial brain Atlas) 方面做的工作。视频如下: Youtube: https://youtu.be/EhYPuBPQ5uI Youku: 该视频在优酷上传后被优酷屏蔽,不清楚什么原因。申诉无效。
Xu Cui
3 sec read

第七届全国近红外光谱脑功能成像学术会议

会议日期:2021年5月22日-24日会议地点:天津师范大学 一、 会议简介       近红外光谱脑功能成像(fNIRS)具有设备购买与使用成本低、可在自然环境条件下使用、具有较高的时间分辨率和空间定位能力等特点,受到了脑科学研究的高度重视。“近红外光谱脑功能成像学术会议”是由北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室朱朝喆教授发起并组织的全国性学术会议。已连续成功举办六届,共吸引全国近百家高校、科研院所及医院的六百余名学者参加。该会议已成为国内规模和影响力最大的fNIRS脑成像学术活动。       本届会议由北京师范大学与天津师范大学联合主办。会议将延用往届会议将学术报告与研究方法工作坊相结合的模式。学术报告模块(5月22日周六)将邀请心理学与认知神经科学领域、基础与临床医学领域以及工程技术领域知名学者汇报其fNIRS最新研究成果;工作坊模块(5月23-24日)由fNIRS领域一线研究者系统讲授fNIRS成像原理、fNIRS实验设计、fNIRS数据分析与统计、fNIRS论文写作以及fNIRS前沿技术等。除理论讲授外,还设置了fNIRS空间定位与数据分析操作(NIRS-KIT软件)环节,此外还安排充足的研讨答疑时间以便与会人员交流互动。       具体日程与详细内容等最新消息请关注后续通知,可通过天津师范大学心理部网站http://psych.tjnu.edu.cn/或北京师范大学国家重点实验室网站http://brain.bnu.edu.cn/,或者扫描下方二维码关注微信公众号-“fNIRS脑成像实验室”查阅更新信息,期盼在天津师范大学与您相聚! 二、会议组织机构 主办单位:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地天津师范大学心理与行为研究院、天津师范大学心理学部、北京师范大学认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室会议主席:白学军、朱朝喆组织委员会:赵春健、杨邵峰、侯鑫、曹正操 三、说明1.        学术报告模块注册费:人民币500元/人;工作坊模块注册费:人民币2500元/人。发票为电子发票,内容均为:“会议费”。两个模块各自独立收费,参会者可根据自己需要进行选择。2.        注册费包括各自模块的资料费、午餐费;其他费用自理。3.        会议报告人免除会议模块注册费,其他费用请自理。4.       ...
Xu Cui
18 sec read

6 Replies to “Some tips to use wavelet toolbox”

  1. Dear Cui,

    Thanks a lot for your post.
    Nevertheless it is not clear to me why we must extract the phases on the cross-correlation and not on the coherence whereas this one is present in the figure. Could you explain ? And then, il web want to extract not only the mean but the dynamic (fluctuation) over time, Is there a solution other than compute a loop?
    Thanks a lot !

  2. Hi Dr. Xu,

    Thanks so much for sharing all this info on your site! I was hoping to get your insight on an analysis decision with WTC: in your 2012 paper, you analyzed the coherence band at period=64 because there was good reason to think that the activity pattern would be at that frequency (task timing = 7s). What would you suggest for hyperscanning studies that aren’t event related, and are instead one long scanning period over the entirety of the subjects’ interaction? Is there any theory about which frequency band is most important in that case, or is the best option just to average the coherence value over a large frequency band?

    Thanks so much!

  3. @Shannon
    It’s a good question, and a difficult question! Let me share briefly with you the thought behind the band choice:

    When I was doing data analysis and saw the coherence figures, there was an obvious red band in the plot. So this is something interesting, I thought. Then I examined its frequency, and found it is at ~7s, which turned out to be our task frequency. So in our paper we wrote we use the coherence value around the task frequency band.

    As you see, we discovered the pattern (red band) first, then try to rationalize this pattern (find a reason choose this band). In the paper it sounds we already have a good reason to choose the band in the first place, but the reality is reverse.

    So while I can’t answer your question directly, I do encourage you to see if there are any patterns emerging in your figure.

  4. Dear Dr.Cui:
    Thanks so much for sharing these ideas,It’s very useful.
    Btw. I want to ask you whether there wiil be some differences between the reult figures that one I did Monte Carlo simulation and one did not(‘mcc’=0).

    sincerely ,it really cost so much time to do Monte Carlo! =_=

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading