Deep learning speed test, my laptop vs AWS g2.2xlarge vs AWS g2.8xlarge vs AWS p2.xlarge vs Paperspace p5000

2 min read

It requires a lot of resources, especially GPU and GPU memory, to train a deep-learning model efficiently. Here I test the time it took to train a model in 3 computers/servers.

1. My own laptop.
CPU: Intel Core i7-7920HQ (Quad Core 3.10GHz, 4.10GHz Turbo, 8MB 45W, w/Intel HD Graphics 630
Memory: 64G
GPU: NVIDIA Quadro M1200 w/4GB GDDR5, 640 CUDA cores

2. AWS g2.2xlarge
CPU: 8 vCPU, High Frequency Intel Xeon E5-2670 (Sandy Bridge) Processors
Memory: 15G
GPU: 1 GPU, High-performance NVIDIA GPUs, each with 1,536 CUDA cores and 4GB of video memory

3. AWS g2.8xlarge
CPU: 32 vCPU, High Frequency Intel Xeon E5-2670 (Sandy Bridge) Processors
Memory: 60G
GPU: 4 GPU, High-performance NVIDIA GPUs, each with 1,536 CUDA cores and 4GB of video memory

The AMI. I used udacity-dl – ami-60f24d76 (The official AMI of Udacity’s Deep Learning Foundations) from the community AMIs.

Test script. Adopted from
Time spent is tracked

import time

from keras.preprocessing import sequence
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Embedding
from keras.layers import LSTM
from keras.datasets import imdb

'''Trains a LSTM on the IMDB sentiment classification task.
The dataset is actually too small for LSTM to be of any advantage
compared to simpler, much faster methods such as TF-IDF + LogReg.
- RNNs are tricky. Choice of batch size is important,
choice of loss and optimizer is critical, etc.
Some configurations won't converge.
- LSTM loss decrease patterns during training can be quite different
from what you see with CNNs/MLPs/etc.
start_time = time.time()

max_features = 20000
maxlen = 80  # cut texts after this number of words (among top max_features most common words)
batch_size = 32

print('Loading data...')
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = imdb.load_data(num_words=max_features)
print(len(x_train), 'train sequences')
print(len(x_test), 'test sequences')

print('Pad sequences (samples x time)')
x_train = sequence.pad_sequences(x_train, maxlen=maxlen)
x_test = sequence.pad_sequences(x_test, maxlen=maxlen)
print('x_train shape:', x_train.shape)
print('x_test shape:', x_test.shape)

print('Build model...')
model = Sequential()
model.add(Embedding(max_features, 128))
model.add(LSTM(128, dropout=0.2, recurrent_dropout=0.2))
model.add(Dense(1, activation='sigmoid'))

# try using different optimizers and different optimizer configs

print('Train...'), y_train,
          validation_data=(x_test, y_test))
score, acc = model.evaluate(x_test, y_test,
print('Test score:', score)
print('Test accuracy:', acc)
time_taken = time.time() - start_time

Result: The table below shows the number of seconds it took to run the above script at 3 sets of parameters (batch_size and LSTM size).

batch_size LSTM size Laptop g2.2xlarge g2.8xlarge
32 128 546 821 878
256 256 155 152 157
1024 256 125 107 110

The result is surprising and confusing to me. I was expecting g2 servers to be much much faster than my own laptop given the capacity of the GPU. But the result shows my laptop is actually faster in smaller parameter values, and only slightly worse in higher parameter values.

I do not know what is going on … Anybody has clue?

[update 2017-04-23]

I was thinking maybe the operating system or some configuration was optimal in AWS. The AMI I used was udacity-dl – ami-60f24d76 (The official AMI of Udacity’s Deep Learning Foundations) from the community AMIs. So I tried a different AMI, a commercial AMI from bitfusion: Maybe it will make a difference? I also tested a new instant type p2.xlarge which has 1 NVIDIA K80 GPU (24G GPU memory) and 60G memory.

batch_size LSTM size Laptop g2.2xlarge g2.8xlarge p2.xlarge
1024 256 125 151 148 101

The result is still disappointing. The AWS g2 instances perform worse than my laptop, and p2 instance only 20% better.

(Of course, GPU is still faster than CPU. On my own laptop, using GPU is ~10x faster than using CPU to run the above code)

[update 2017-04-02]

I checked out Paperspace’s p5000 computer. It comes with a dedicated p5000 GPU with 2048 cores and 16G GPU memory. I tested with the same code. I find the training is much faster on p5000 (ironically, the data downloading part is slow). The training part is 4x faster than my laptop.

batch_size LSTM size Laptop g2.2xlarge g2.8xlarge p2.xlarge paperspace p5000
1024 256 125 151 148 101 50

(Note, the above time includes the data downloading part, which is about 25 seconds).

Paperspace p5000 wins so far!

[update 2017-05-03]

I purchased Nvidia’s 1080 Ti and installed it on my desktop. It has 3,584 cores and 11G GPU memory. It look 7s for this GPU to train 1 epoch of the above script and it’s 3x times faster than my laptop.

batch_size LSTM size Laptop (1 epoch) 1080 Ti (1 epoch)
1024 256 21 7

Is AI able to write papers?

As researchers, we all have a dream: it would be fantastic if AI could write papers one day! This sounds like a science fiction,...
Xu Cui
3 min read


作为科研人员,我们都有个梦想,如果有一天AI可以帮我写论文就太好了!这听上去好像是遥远的科幻,不过,当我使用了文献鸟Stork的新高级功能“人工智能创意论文摘要”后,我觉得,这一天马上就要来了。 为了看看人工智能有多厉害,我随便想了个有意思的主题,就是人和宠物狗之间的欺骗行为的大脑机制。这是一个还没有被研究的课题,到现在为止还没有人同时测量过一个人和他的宠物狗的大脑,当然也没有文章发表。我有这个想法已经有一段时间,但还是个模糊的想法,具体怎么实现以及结果怎样我也不知道。于是,我看看人工智能会写出什么。于是我输入了: Deception between human and pet dog, an fNIRS hyperscanning study 点击“开始”按钮后,人工智能好像想了几秒钟,然后文字便源源不断地出现了。 The present study aimed to investigate the neural correlates of deception...
Xu Cui
1 min read

3 Replies to “Deep learning speed test, my laptop vs AWS g2.2xlarge…”

  1. The result of your speed test also may be influenced by operating system of computer/server, I think, it depends on how do OS process that code you wrote (c, python, matlab, etc).

  2. I’m having similar experience with AWS and Tensorflow. I’m trying to run examples from this excellent lecture: (materials are here: My desktop doesn’t have any GPU, but it’s running the examples 2-2.5 faster than p2-xlarge AWS instance. Definitely I’m doing something wrong (I’m pretty new to AWS and Tensorflow), but I can’t see it. I’ll be watching this post to see if you found any solution.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *