Temporal resolution of CW fNIRS devices

1 min read

This is a guest post by Ning Liu from Stanford University.

Temporal resolution provides information on the distance of time between the acquisitions of two images (data) of the same area. It is the reciprocal of sampling rate (or acquisition rate) of an fNIRS device. For some devices, sampling rate is a fixed number; for some other ones, sampling rate may depend on number of sources or detectors to use. Why is that? It is because they have different instrumental design. For those with unfixed sampling rate, multiple sources time-share an optical detector by means of a multiplexing circuit that turns the sources on and off in sequence, so that only one source within the detector range is on at any given time. The NIRx system, for instance, are using this type of design. For those with fixed sampling rate, they usually use low frequency modulated light source to provide the excitation light, thus one detector can ‘see’ only one source.

For instance, Hitachi ETG4000 system has sampling rate of 10Hz (from http://www.hitachi.com/businesses/healthcare/products-support/opt/etg4000/contents2.html), thus its temporal resolution is 100ms. Some other device, such as NIRScout, has sampling rate from 2.5 – 62.5 Hz (from https://nirx.net/nirscout/), thus its temporal resolution is 16 – 400ms. Why the sampling rate is changing from 2.5 – 62.5 Hz? That’s because users can choose different number of sources and detectors in their configuration. The more number of sources and detectors to use, the smaller the sampling rate. The following table is from a review article (Scholkmann, et al., 2014) on NeuroImaging volume 85 (2104), a special issue of functional near-infrared spectroscopy. It summarizes the specifications of some popular commercially available fNIRS devices, mainly focused on continuous wave devices.

Time resolution of NIRS devices
Time resolution of NIRS devices (click to enlarge, F. Scholkmann et al. / NeuroImage 85 (2014) 6–27)


Receive email notification via email
Don't want to miss new papers in your field? Check out Stork we developed:

fNIRS Journal Club 视频

546个被试的大型实验是怎么做的?近红外超扫描技术如何揭开群体冲突的神经机制?北京时间2020年5月29日周五上午11点,北京师范大学的马燚娜教授(Yina Ma)为大家讲解了她们组刚刚在Nature Neuroscience发表的文章。下面是报告视频。第一个是在Youtube,第二个是在youku。 Youtube:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4qZ7zP-BGz4Youku:https://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNDY5MTc0MjAxMg==.html 她讲的文献如下: Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict. Nature neuroscience https://www.storkapp.me/pubpaper/32341541 中文摘要(人工智能翻译,仅供参考):陷入群体的个人有时会失去自己的个性,冒着通常会避免的风险,以无端的敌对态度与外界接触。在这项研究中,我们确定了右侧背外侧前额叶皮层(rDLPFC)和右侧颞顶交界处(rTPJ)的组内神经同步是组间敌对性的潜在机制。我们将546个人组织为91个三对三人小组间比赛,诱导了组内亲和,并使用功能性近红外光谱仪测量了神经活动和组内同步。在组内亲和之后,个人给组内成员的钱比给组外成员的钱多,并且捐出更多的钱来击败竞争对手。组内亲和减少了rDLPFC的活动,并增加了rDLPFC和rTPJ之间的功能连接。尤其是在组外攻击期间,组内亲和还增加了rDLPFC和rTPJ中的组内同步,并且组内rDLPFC同步与组间敌对性正相关。组内同步减少前额活动可能可以解释组内联结如何导致对外界的冲动和集体敌视。
Xu Cui
13 sec read

Remote fNIRS

Everytime I met Dr Leanne Hirshfield, I am impressed by her energy and passion with the fNIRS technology. It was a pleasure listening to...
Xu Cui
4 min read

fNIRS Journal Club 通知 2020/5/29, 11am

546个被试的大型实验是怎么做的?近红外超扫描技术如何揭开群体冲突的神经机制?北京时间2020年5月29日周五上午11点,北京师范大学的马燚娜教授(Yina Ma)将为大家讲解她们组刚刚在Nature Neuroscience发表的文章。 欢迎大家参加并参与讨论。 时间: 北京时间2020年5月29日周五上午11点 地点: https://zoom.com/j/84320310196房间号: 843 2031 0196 密码: 600516 她要讲的文献如下: Within-group synchronization in the prefrontal cortex associates with intergroup conflict....
Xu Cui
7 sec read

One Reply to “Temporal resolution of CW fNIRS devices”

  1. Hello Ning and Xu,

    Great read, thanks for this!

    Just wanted to let you know that the NIRScout has been extended to 100hz max sampling rate with the newest version of NIRStar 15-2, so the typical range for sampling with that system would then be roughly ~4-100hz, depending on the source illumination multiplexing sequence.

    Keep up the great work!


    Thomas Johannsen
    NIRx Medical Technologies

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *